The promise of community-driven preprints in ecology and evolution
Proc. R. Soc. B 292: 20241487
published article
pre-registered
data available
code available
Abstract
Publishing preprints is quickly becoming commonplace in ecology and evolutionary biology. Preprints can facilitate the rapid sharing of scientific knowledge establishing precedence and enabling feedback from the research community before peer review. Yet, significant barriers to preprint use exist, including language barriers, a lack of understanding about the benefits of preprints and a lack of diversity in the types of research outputs accepted (e.g. reports). Community-driven preprint initiatives can allow a research community to come together to break down these barriers to improve equity and coverage of global knowledge. Here, we explore the first preprints uploaded to EcoEvoRxiv (n = 1216), a community-driven preprint server for ecologists and evolutionary biologists, to characterize preprint use in ecology, evolution and conservation. Our perspective piece highlights some of the unique initiatives that EcoEvoRxiv has taken to break down barriers to scientific publishing by exploring the composition of articles, how gender and career stage influence preprint use, whether preprints are associated with greater open science practices (e.g. code and data sharing) and tracking preprint publication outcomes. Our analysis identifies areas that we still need to improve upon but highlights how community-driven initiatives, such as EcoEvoRxiv, can play a crucial role in shaping publishing practices in biology.
Citation
BibTeX citation:
@article{noble2025,
author = {Noble, Daniel W. A. and Xirocostas, Zoe A. and Wu, Nicholas
C. and Martinig, April Robin and Almeida, Rafaela A. and
Bairos-Novak, Kevin R. and Balti, Heikel and Bertram, Michael G. and
Bliard, Louis and Brand, Jack A. and Byrne, Ilha and Chan, Ying-Chi
and Clink, Dena Jane and Corbel, Quentin and Correia, Ricardo A. and
Crawford-Ash, Jordann and Culina, Antica and D’Bastiani, Elvira and
Deme, Gideon G. and Leite, Melina de Souza and Dhellemmes, Félicie
and Dimri, Shreya and Drobniak, Szymek M. and Elsy, Alexander D. and
Everingham, Susan E. and Gascoigne, Samuel J. L. and Grainger,
Matthew J. and Hossack, Gavin C. and Hovstad, Knut Anders and
Ivimey-Cook, Edward R. and Jones, Matt Lloyd and Kačergytė, Ineta
and Küstner, Georg and Leibold, Dalton C. and Mair, Magdalena M. and
Martin, Jake and Mizuno, Ayumi and Moodie, Iain R. and Moreau, David
and O’Dea, Rose E. and Orr, James A. and Paquet, Matthieu and
Parajuli, Rabindra and Pick, Joel L. and Pottier, Patrice and
Purgar, Marija and Recio, Pablo and Roche, Dominique G. and Royauté,
Raphaël and Shafiei Sabet, Saeed and Segovia, Julio M. G. and Silva,
Inês and Sánchez-Tójar, Alfredo and Soares, Bruno E. and Szabo,
Birgit and Takola, Elina and Thoré, Eli S. J. and Timilsina, Bishnu
and van Dis, Natalie E. and Verberk, Wilco C. E. P. and Vriend,
Stefan J. G. and Wild, Kristoffer H. and Williams, Coralie and Yang,
Yefeng and Nakagawa, Shinichi and Lagisz, Malgorzata},
publisher = {Royal Society},
title = {The Promise of Community-Driven Preprints in Ecology and
Evolution},
journal = {Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences},
volume = {292},
number = {2039},
pages = {20241487},
date = {2025-01-29},
url = {https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/full/10.1098/rspb.2024.1487},
doi = {10.1098/rspb.2024.1487},
langid = {en},
abstract = {Publishing preprints is quickly becoming commonplace in
ecology and evolutionary biology. Preprints can facilitate the rapid
sharing of scientific knowledge establishing precedence and enabling
feedback from the research community before peer review. Yet,
significant barriers to preprint use exist, including language
barriers, a lack of understanding about the benefits of preprints
and a lack of diversity in the types of research outputs accepted
(e.g. reports). Community-driven preprint initiatives can allow a
research community to come together to break down these barriers to
improve equity and coverage of global knowledge. Here, we explore
the first preprints uploaded to EcoEvoRxiv (n = 1216), a
community-driven preprint server for ecologists and evolutionary
biologists, to characterize preprint use in ecology, evolution and
conservation. Our perspective piece highlights some of the unique
initiatives that EcoEvoRxiv has taken to break down barriers to
scientific publishing by exploring the composition of articles, how
gender and career stage influence preprint use, whether preprints
are associated with greater open science practices (e.g. code and
data sharing) and tracking preprint publication outcomes. Our
analysis identifies areas that we still need to improve upon but
highlights how community-driven initiatives, such as EcoEvoRxiv, can
play a crucial role in shaping publishing practices in biology.}
}
For attribution, please cite this work as:
Noble, D. W. A., Z. A. Xirocostas, N. C. Wu, A. R. Martinig, R. A.
Almeida, K. R. Bairos-Novak, H. Balti, et al. 2025. The promise of
community-driven preprints in ecology and evolution. Proceedings of
the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 292:20241487.